DR"s Stroker Dyno #s

[SAgosto]

http://www.3si.org/forum/showthread.php?t=401570&page=2

Sorry Audible, 3SX's dyno reads higher than Michael Irving.

[JagdStealth]

I like how it's a nice normal discussion and 2-3 people keep coming intot he thread and trying to start shit with 3sx

[TajMan]

"I lust after that flat power curve"

[DCIV]

I dont, I want to see what it would take for that power curve to look like normal turboed cars. Also never using nitrous? Come on we all know how much HP you can get from a turboed car with nitrous. He even has the billet crank that can take it. I wish he would just go aem, bigger turbos, and nitrous.


Coop

[eljefefx]

I think the thing to realize is that he got numbers similar to what 3SX got on no funny gas. To me, that says a lot.

[SAgosto]

[quote=""AudibleSilence""]You are the ultimate Matt nut swinger Shawn.[/quote]

Absolutely not. Matt takes many cheap shots to Chris. I just get a giggle that he 0wns 3SX every second of the day without even trying. Perhaps the reason I am pro DR is because I see that whenever Chris opens his mouth, not one or two but like 3+ lies comes out.

The lies are also intentional and misleading.

[GTO Assassin]

Call me a noob as I know it was discussed, but Matt's running a 3.5 to IPO's 3.0 correct? And while everyone seems to be playing that down, I'm sorry but that half liter is a fucking lot isn't it? I mean Matt is able to run his turbo's at lower boost, and his engine is way more efficient. Someone please tell me how you can compare these two..... I use to really like Matt, but he's an arrogant prick a lot of the time. And it shits me that members are so fucking scared of saying something like that as they may get offside with him, or other swingers. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of IPO, but whatever Matt says (even if it's in real poor taste or just plain rude) he doesn't get called out. And that fucking shits me.

Scotty

[TajMan]

Matt M. vs. Scotty
everyone who votes Scotty off the internet say I

[CHAN]

Im with scotty, matt is running a bigger motor and turbos right? I just dont see what makes them in the same class. But thats just me talking and i havent ever done anything so i cant say anything, but i dont think its fair that IPO is going with the 3.0 or 3.1 whatever the hell people want it to be and there giving them shit about what matt does at lower boost and no spray.

[aaronatstate]

Its not the fact of what horsepower they are making compared to boost, its the fact that Matt ran almost a 9 flat with 200 less horsepower. Basically with 995AWHP IPO should be running a lot faster times then what he is. Matt is only making 818 or so AWHP, yet running faster the IPO.

[boardFreak5]

Im pretty sure that 3sx never got a run in on their 995 AWHP tune. i might be wrong though.

david

[SAgosto]

3SX has a 3.1L even though they lie like fuck to say 3.0L because the retards on 3SI see these #s and 3.0L and assume they will get the same #s. Both cars are very different in respect to displacement, piggyback vs. aem, etc.. But, the point still remains: 3SX's dyno #s are sketchy at best. The real funny thing is that it's such a known fact that is hinted 204943092309240924309243092092092409 times but people still post in the thread and jerk them off as 3SX hides under the 3SI shield. I remember a thread while back and I flat out said that their dyno doesn't match the traps at all. A LOT of people caught on but some didn't.

[Alan92rttt]

Scotty you have not been around as long as some here. Chris was firing cheap shots at Matt for a damn long time and he just let them go. He's finally decided to send a few shots back at Chris back.

When you compare Dyno readings and time slips between the DR car and T4 something does not add up. If T4 has more HP it should faster. Its not.

[SAgosto]

[quote=""Alan92rttt""]Scotty you have not been around as long as some here. Chris was firing cheap shots at Matt for a damn long time and he just let them go. He's finally decided to send a few shots back at Chris back.

When you compare Dyno readings and time slips between the DR car and T4 something does not add up. If T4 has more HP it should faster. Its not.[/quote]

Wow. This post surprised me. Alan, you sure it's you? You're a different man lately.

I didn't realize Chris was the one that started it? I don't remember that far back. They go back and forth now and it's amusing but at least it's typically over trying to better each other.

[DCIV]

Alright here is what it comes down to for me. 3sx either has bigger turbos to make "more" HP then matt or nitrous plays a bigger role then most of us will admit. I say more because oviously matt running faster times with "less" HP says one of two things. One chris is a terrible driver, two their dyno is off. Seeing as chris can pull such low 60's I am going to say the rest of the track in an AWD car should be on autopilot. So their dyno must be off. We all know it is and no matter how much bitching we say about it nothign is going to change. I do belive that .5 makes a diff. though when matt can put those numbers down with those turbos and no one else with those turbos on a 3.0 has put down those numbers at that boost. In this case I have to aplaude 3sx for using nitrous becuase I am going to use it and I love to see results of it used. Scotty is right and matt has been being a little defensive and agruementive latly though.


Coop

[SAgosto]

The dyno being off was suggested by everyone including Jesus himself.

I have noticed Matt being a bit more aggressive lately.

[Dark-Hawk]

I'm sure after the amount of cheap shots Chris has taken - including taking shots on his dyslexia, it's just hit a breaking point for Matt.

[SAgosto]

Oh. I forgot about that. That's low ball.

[Jeremy C]

Yeah, when you take shots at someone disability, that person has every right in the world to fire back with everything they can. If someone took pot shots at my disability, I would probably do whatever I could to give that person a disability of their own.