Both? I did some reading and it's a known failure with these. They were all rust belt trucks too. Ours was from the Chicago area.Ryan wrote:Rust? Or just fatigue?
Yeah....this was supposed to be an "introduction" course to off roading. Not rock crawling. It was something like 30+ newer Jeeps, 3 Toyotas (one fairly new and expensive Land Cruiser), and us. During the classroom portion they asked who had a truck older than 2015. Maybe 3 hands went up. The Jeep in front of us was stock as far as I could tell and he was banging his undercarriage off a bunch of rocks because he had 32" stock tires. I don't think he was happy.Steve wrote:So much for taking it easy your first trip out.
If I had known what they actually expected us to do, I don't think we would have gone.
With that said, the guy leading our group said he was 'impressed as shit' with our truck up until it broke. He didn't even know they made Hummers with dual lockers and a 4:1 transfer. The best part was when we made it to the top of this one gnarly hill. He said 'your locker handled that nicely'. I told him we didn't even have it turned on. I wanted to see if what it took to get it stuck before we used it. We never got stuck.
This truck has a lot of upgrades, but none of them really help with performance besides the tires. As far as actual capability goes, it's mostly stock. It's old and worn out and basically stock...and it did shit that blew my mind before it broke.
The only other failures I know about were a tire blowout and a near-fire due to a dead electric cooling fan on a very experienced JK Cherokee that had been trailered in.




