99 VR-4 wing on a Stealth? ::screams::

[JagdStealth]

TSX is nicer than the Si, that's for sure. You're right about 2.4L it's the non V6 motor in the older Accord I think?

I was looking for something more Luxury than sport so that's why I wasn't a big fan of the TSX. It's billed as an entry level luxury car for the younger market who doesn't have $50k to spend, but it felt less luxurious than the Accord coupe and more like a trumped up civic, which is good if you're looking for something light and nimble that's a bit nicer than your average car.

[vegasidol]

Not a fan of the combat wing on a stealth... But maybe that's just because it's not a 'usual combination'. I'd have to see it on the road.

[aaronatstate]

I do not like the 99 VR-4 wing on a Stealth at all. The only 3000 wing I like on the Stealths are the hoop wing, but that is only on certain cars (gate's for example). The 96 Stealth wing looks best on any Stealth hands down.

[pearlwhite3kgt]

Looks better than your vette.

[Chris GTO TT]

[quote=""pearlwhite3kgt""]Looks better than your vette.[/quote]

uhhhh what was the point of that?

[JagdStealth]

Just a troll...

I'm not a fan of the cmobat wing on a stealth either, doesn't flow with the lines of the car that well.

[BillyC]

The banana looks best on Stealths...the combat wing is too angular and doesn't flow well with the fluid lines on a Stealth.

[oxrageous]

[quote=""pearlwhite3kgt""]Looks better than your vette.[/quote]
I'm hurt by this.

[Wolf_Zero]

I don't like wings on stealths at all, they look better wingless IMO. That being said, the '99 wing is a ricer wing to me. Hell the first time my friend saw a '99 VR-4 he told me he saw a vr-4 in great condition but it was riced out.

[BleedScarlet]

Combat wing looks hideous on anything that's not a fighter plane.

[EvilNCarnate]

I dont think the 99 wing goes with the stealth rear, just the fact the lights are so high up on the ass of those. There is no separation. The 3000's have a little separation to them.

[TheHarleyMod]

I don't particularly care for the '99 wing on Stealths, but it is an attention-getter.

[oxrageous]

I think that looks freaking hideous, particularly with the huger ricer fart can. I won't even comment on the Home Depot black fins. What a waste.

[pearlwhite3kgt]

[quote=""Chris GTO TT""]uhhhh what was the point of that?[/quote]

A joke.

[Chris GTO TT]

[quote=""pearlwhite3kgt""]A joke. [/quote]

[Vitamin A]

Chris>Pearl White

[oxrageous]

[quote=""pearlwhite3kgt""]A joke. [/quote]
You weren't joking. Nice try, however.

[Vitamin A]

[Duck Vader]

To each his own I guess. I personally don't like big wings at all, on any car, ever.

[~jessmar~]

isn't the banana wing a kind of essential signifier of "stealthness?"

don't read me wrong--i love the stealth design; but take away the banana, and it's a generically early '90's rounded / swoop / hint-of-cab forward design. there's a reason idiots out there confuse them with probes, DSMs, 4th gen GM F-cars and all the other products of early '90s thinking that had the same cues.

but the banana wing--that was different, special, memorable. to my mind, remove the banana wing, and you've taken away a good share of the car's identity.

and in general, thumbs way, way down to the '99 wing. if you're gonna hang a huge wing on the back, i say make it a real aerodynamic enhancement and just go for an APR GTC-300 or 500 fin.

~jm~