looks like my idea has been ignored. can't say I blame them. Putting your reputation on the line in a definitive apples to apples challenge would be enough to scare most shops. most....
and Chris's comment of how it would only be two shops competing if it happened. you never know when another smaller shop may throw it's hat into the ring.
[quote=""Darkhelmet""]looks like my idea has been ignored. can't say I blame them. Putting your reputation on the line in a definitive apples to apples challenge would be enough to scare most shops. most....
and Chris's comment of how it would only be two shops competing if it happened. you never know when another smaller shop may throw it's hat into the ring.[/quote]
I don't think Matt would have any problem with it.
[quote=""Dark-Hawk""]I think in the long run people like Adam, Trevor and Jack have shown what someone at home without a racing budget could do.[/quote]
exactly.
what about a private person with no shop backing whatsever?
Given the same amount of money, I would think that Matt M. and Ray would have a substantial advantage over IPO and Nelson: both of them are incredible drivers.
Oh yeah, that and they don't have to fit 600 lbs of ego in the car with them.
why not just give them both the same stock car and not allowed to tweak at all. Just to prove who is the better driver. You know if there was a budget there would be some cheating.
Coop
[quote=""Melis""]The cop asked Coop "Are you really a firefighter?" Coop was like "yeah" then the cop said "ok your in charge" then the cop left
[/quote]
[quote=""Hannibalzero""]Given the same amount of money, I would think that Matt M. and Ray would have a substantial advantage over IPO and Nelson: both of them are incredible drivers.
Oh yeah, that and they don't have to fit 600 lbs of ego in the car with them.[/quote]
Nelson would need to take a dictionary to translate the controls. Ignition? Huh?
Ig-ni-ssshunn
[quote=""Dark-Hawk""]I think Matt has already proven he is the better driver.[/quote]
Although he might be reluctant to admit it, I don't IPO would try to argue otherwise either. The question at hand is who can get the most power and best times out of ___________ (fill in the blank with the latest gripe of the week).
Does anybody really care if Matt's motor has an extra .5L displacement, or if IPO really has a 3.1L motor? Just congratulate the other and move on. One person's success with a different build doesn't diminish the next person's accomplishments. Honestly, their bickering back and forth is retarded...
I never really take into consideration what there cars do. No "off" the shelf part anyone sells is gonna make your car do what theres does. Who gives a shit if you cant have 100billion pulls on the same crank. Not everyone has the means to keep tearing the motor down to check 2 see if the crank is cracking. No one is gonna drive around a gutted car. So in sight...nothing there cars do has ANYTHING to do with a customer's car comparason. I think it's pointless to have a stock 3.0 block to "proove" what it can do.....if you have the option to do something larger...y not?